In college football, there are not that many games in a season, at least when compared to other sports. For an FCS school, there are just eleven opportunities. It’s important to make the most of each and every one of them.
The Citadel has played nine games this season. In three of those games, the team’s performance has been absolutely awful, and I mean awful in the “did they know there was a game today?” sense. That’s fully one-third of the games.
In sports, every now and then you’re going to have a bad day where nothing goes right (the same is true for life in general). Most fans can understand that. Having it happen once every three games — well, that’s not so understandable. Worse, all three thud-fests were conference games (Elon, Western Carolina, and now Wofford).
In past posts, I called the Elon game a debacle, and the WCU loss a disaster. I’m not sure what adjective applies to The Citadel’s game on Saturday against the Terriers. Perhaps I should call it “disheartening” just to stay with the D-word theme.
Speaking of D:
- On the second Wofford series, the Terriers were faced with a 3rd-and-8, and promptly converted it by completing a 23-yard pass — this from a team that rarely throws the ball (Wofford entered the contest last in the nation in passing yardage per game). You just knew it was going to be a long day for the Bulldogs when that happened.
- That third-down conversion was one of seven the Terriers picked up in eleven tries. Wofford had come into the game only converting 38% of its third downs.
- Of course, Wofford had 13 first downs in which it didn’t even need to convert a third down.
- Wofford had lost 13 fumbles and thrown 6 interceptions prior to Saturday’s game, but the only Terrier turnover on Saturday came deep in Bulldog territory with Wofford already leading 29-10.
- That fumble would be the only time the Terriers failed to score in the “red zone” in seven tries (four touchdowns, two field goals).
The defense’s day was probably best epitomized by a play in the second quarter. Wofford faced a 3rd and 1 at The Citadel’s 33 yard line. As the Terriers broke their huddle, an image of Terrence Reese in full “make some noise, get pumped up” mode appeared on the video board. Wofford ran an inside handoff for three yards and a first down, with Reese then penalized for a late hit. The Terriers scored four plays later.
The defensive issues weren’t particularly surprising, given the Bulldogs’ struggles on D for most of the season, and the success Wofford has had against The Citadel in recent years. During the Kevin Higgins era, the Terriers have scored at least 28 points in every game against the Bulldogs.
However, unlike last season’s game against Wofford, on Saturday the Bulldog offense was equally disappointing.
I’m not sure what to make of the way the quarterbacks were utilized during the game. Obviously, Bart Blanchard and Miguel Starks were both coming off injuries, and if they couldn’t play, that would be one thing. As it happened, they both played, although whether either should have seemed debatable.
Blanchard was clearly struggling with a bad toe (and he’s had a bad ankle all year). Never the fastest of QBs, he was no threat to run. Any nominal “option” plays that The Citadel ran with Blanchard in the game were really just handoffs to Terrell Dallas or Van Dyke Jones, and Wofford treated them as such. He also appeared to be a sitting duck in the pocket.
After the game, according to a story in The Post and Courier, Blanchard was wearing a walking boot in the locker room, just as he had in prior games against Furman and Samford, when he didn’t play. I’m not sure why he played against Wofford, either.
I appreciated the effort and the determination, though. Even with a bad wheel, he threw a really impressive pass to Kevin Hardy that would lead to a field goal; I’m not sure all of the fans in the stands appreciated how good a throw that was. Blanchard did not get much help from his receivers, as there were several dropped passes (a recurring issue for most of the season).
Blanchard was in the game late in the first half when The Citadel got the ball on its own 6 yard line. There were only 61 seconds left on the clock, and the Bulldogs actually had a little momentum, having scored on their previous drive to cut Wofford’s lead to seven, at 17-10. The Terriers had just one timeout left, so the Bulldogs could have run out the clock.
However, on first down Blanchard went back to pass and was sacked, fumbling the ball. Lincoln Kling recovered in the end zone for the Bulldogs, but the result was a safety. Wofford returned the ensuing free kick to the Bulldog 40 and would eventually kick a field goal to take a 22-10 lead into the locker room. It was like giving away five free points and all the momentum. Wofford then got the ball first to open the third quarter, drove right down the field and scored. Ballgame.
Tommy Edwards replaced Blanchard just before the end of the third quarter, moved the Bulldogs 38 yards in five plays, and then threw an interception. On the Bulldogs’ next series (now trailing 43-10), Miguel Starks started taking the snaps. He would lead The Citadel to the game’s final score on his second series of the game.
This I really didn’t understand. If Starks was injured and couldn’t start, why put him in the game with 10 minutes left and the team trailing by five touchdowns? I didn’t see the point in that. If he had been healthy enough to play at all, he should have started over the clearly ailing Blanchard, or come into the game when the outcome was still in doubt.
Kevin Higgins noted that Edwards “doesn’t have much experience at all”, and that’s certainly true, but in retrospect I wonder if it would have been better for all concerned if Edwards had played instead of either Blanchard or Starks.
Of course, I’m just a yokel watching the game. I don’t have any inside information on what the thinking was regarding playing Blanchard/Edwards/Starks. It may be that Starks’ injury is the type that won’t get worse, but won’t get much better anytime soon. If that’s the case, the coaches may have wanted to see what he was capable of doing, so they could take that into account for next week.
To have such a trouncing occur on Homecoming was also a bit dispiriting. Without the TD at the end of the game, the Bulldogs would have suffered their worst Homecoming loss since 1989. It’s not the best way to impress visiting alums, that’s for sure.
Things I may or may not have heard in and around the various reunion tents:
- “Why don’t we run the wishbone?”
- “Well, we’re a basketball school, anyway.”
- “Maybe the guys on the team would play better if we rewarded a good season by letting them stay at the beach house during second semester, instead of the barracks.”
- “How long have we been wearing navy pants?”
- “Skip the orange juice, just give me what’s left in that bottle.”
A few observations about some off the field issues:
— Over the past couple of years, I’ve noticed that a significant number of cadets don’t make it to the game, and I’m not the only one who has spotted this trend. At Saturday’s game I guesstimated that at least one-third, if not more, of the corps was not in the stands during the game. Where were they?
This is something that the school administration needs to address before next season. I know there are some legitimate absences, but the bottom line is that at least 90% of the corps of cadets needs to be in the stands at Johnson Hagood Stadium at every game. Right now, that’s not happening.
— I’ve said this before, but if I attend too many more games at Johnson Hagood I’m going to eventually go deaf, thanks to the sound system speakers, which, apparently inspired by Spinal Tap, are set at “11”. At least on this particular Saturday A) the referee’s microphone worked, and B) they didn’t play the “clap your hands” riff as the Bulldogs lined up to punt.
— Video board, good: the Randy Bresnik message intro was great. Excellent job setting that up. I can’t imagine going into outer space. Of course, I’m not crazy about heights…
— Video board, unintentionally amusing: the Anthony Maldanado speech (through no fault of his own, of course). Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
— I thought the attendance was okay (Wofford didn’t bring a lot of fans). Plenty of alums were wandering around, taking in the sights at the almost brand-new stadium, marveling at bathroom facilities that weren’t holdovers from the 19th century. Everyone was ready to cheer; there just wasn’t anything worth cheering about, at least on the field.
— MVPs for the day, school of business administration: both the Class of ’59 and the Class of ’69 presented enormous monetary contributions to the school on Saturday. Major, major thumbs-up for those two classes. Outstanding.
— MVPs for the day, school of recreation and leisure: this would go to the Class of ’89, which had a huge throng of partiers at its reunion tent, all of whom appeared to be having a good time. Great turnout by that group of youngsters.
The Citadel now has two games left on the schedule, road contests against UT-Chattanooga and Georgia Southern. A winning season is still a possibility, but it will be a tall order to triumph against both an improved Mocs squad and the traditionally tough Eagles. The Bulldogs will certainly have to play much, much better than they did on Saturday if they hope to win either of those games, much less both of them.
Filed under: Football, The Citadel | Tagged: Anthony Maldanado, Bart Blanchard, Elon, FCS, Furman, Georgia Southern, Johnson Hagood Stadium, Kevin Higgins, Lincoln Kling, Miguel Starks, Randy Bresnik, Samford, Terrell Dallas, Terrence Reese, The Citadel, The Post and Courier, Tommy Edwards, UT-Chattanooga, Van Dyke Jones, Western Carolina, Wofford |