This is just a quick blog post, which is a little different for me, to be sure. However, I wanted to briefly comment on this article by Steve Yanda in The Washington Post: Link
From the story:
Those familiar with The Citadel athletics said the most daunting challenge Chuck Driesell will face is persuading quality players to commit to four years of a military environment. But sitting in a still-barren office just more than two weeks after he was hired, Driesell said he plans to confront that factor the same way he has dealt with perpetually being known as Lefty’s son — by embracing it wholeheartedly.
“I think you have to sell it,” Driesell said of The Citadel’s military component. “I don’t think it’s something you paint as a negative, because it’s not. It’s a positive. Here, they get a leadership degree in addition to their regular degree. And everyone needs leaders.”
Quick thoughts:
1) How about Yanda actually referring to “The Citadel athletics” and not “Citadel athletics”? Good for him. It’s nice to see someone (or someone’s editor) paying attention. Now if only we could get more people within our own department of athletics to do the same…
2) Driesell again noted that he wanted to use the military aspect of the school as a positive. As I said in a previous post, he’s talking a good game.
Further along in the story:
After Ed Conroy left last month to take the head coaching job at Tulane, calls from hopeful candidates began to flood Les Robinson’s home in nearby Sullivan’s Island. The former Citadel coach and athletic director immediately was drawn to an aspirant he had recruited to the school 29 years earlier. The other callers pried for inside information on competing applicants or their own chances for landing the gig.
“But Chuck was strictly asking me about what it is like coaching there, which is the most important question,” said Robinson, who led The Citadel from 1974 to 1985. “Now, if I was coaching at Wofford or Georgia Southern, that wouldn’t be that important a question. It wouldn’t be a lot different coaching at Appalachian State or Georgia Southern. But it’s different coaching at The Citadel.”
Robinson said he “oversold” the military aspect while recruiting players to avoid near-immediate attrition once they arrived on campus in the fall. In his first 10 years at the helm, Robinson noted, not one player transferred out because the military discipline was too intense.
1) Okay, so Yanda didn’t use the “The” in this section, but in this case it is acceptable usage. I would have called Les Robinson the “former Bulldog coach” instead, but no matter. There is no question that the name of the school can be problematic for a grammarian, much less your typical sportswriter. There is also no question that I pay too much attention to this subject.
2) Again, we have a positive insight on Chuck Driesell, who recognized that coaching at The Citadel is not quite like coaching at other Southern Conference schools.
3) Also, Robinson’s suggestion that he “oversold” the military aspect of the school is something all coaches at the military college would do well to emulate. Of course, they might avoid emulating his first four seasons as head coach, as Robinson’s first four teams had a combined record of 31-70.
In his fifth year, though, he went 20-7.
—
Finally, while the article notes that The Citadel has never received a bid to the NCAA tournament, Chuck Driesell said that making the NCAAs would be “an annual goal” and “attainable”. Good. No “every four years, maybe we’ll have a decent team” line, which I’ve heard one too many times before.
There is, after all, an NCAA sub-regional next year in Charlotte. That’s an easy trip up I-77 for me…
Filed under: Basketball, The Citadel | Tagged: Chuck Driesell, Ed Conroy, Les Robinson, NCAA Tournament, Southern Conference, Steve Yanda, The Citadel, The Washington Post | Leave a comment »