I didn’t touch on this in my preview of the game between The Citadel and Arizona, but I figured I could make a quick post out of the question: why exactly is The Citadel playing Arizona in football in the first place? I’m sure fans of both schools are a little curious about that.
Well, for money, of course. The Citadel has to play at least one football “guarantee” game every season to balance (or attempt to balance) its budget for athletics. On the other hand, surely The Citadel could find an FBS opponent a little closer to home, an ACC or SEC team, or even a Big East squad. After all, the Bulldogs have played teams from all those leagues in the last few seasons, along with a Big XII team (Texas A&M), a Big 10 outfit (Wisconsin)…oh, wait a second. I see a pattern — a pattern created by none other than Les Robinson.
That’s right, The Citadel’s national tour of BCS conferences is a result of one of former AD Les Robinson’s grand ideas. You can read about it here: Link
The game against the Pac-10’s Arizona is the last of the “BCS series” for The Citadel, which in the past five years has traveled to play against the aforementioned Texas A&M and Wisconsin, along with Pittsburgh of the Big East, Florida of the SEC, and North Carolina and Clemson of the ACC.
Just prior to that five-year run the Bulldogs traveled to Oxford to play Mississippi and Tallahassee to tangle with Florida State. The coach for all these games has been Kevin Higgins, so keep that in mind when evaluating his 25-32 record at The Citadel. I think there is a good chance Higgins is the only head coach in the country to have played teams from all six BCS conferences in the last five seasons.
After this game the Bulldogs will have completed the Robinson Quest, having played teams from all six BCS leagues. Robinson even set up a “bonus” two-game series with Princeton of the Ivy League. I am not sure current AD Larry Leckonby is crazy about scheduling the likes of Arizona or (to a lesser extent) Wisconsin, as the travel for those games eats into the guarantee. It was also a significant issue for the game at Princeton.
I can certainly understand that, and in the future I expect most, if not all, of The Citadel’s football guarantee games to come against SEC/ACC schools. However, I don’t think it hurts the school to travel out of its home region on occasion. I agree with the comment Robinson made in the linked article about such games providing needed national exposure. Another thing they provide is an opportunity for alums living outside the southeast to attend a game.
The Citadel brought a very good crowd to the Princeton game last year. I can attest to the number of PA/NJ/NY alums in attendance, most of whom showed up with their families, and some with friends too. We need to play games like that once in a while, if only for those fans.
The game against Arizona will give some of our alums on the west coast a chance to see their team in action. Admittedly, a game against UCLA or Stanford might have been a better bet in terms of Bulldog supporters showing up — I’m not sure how many alums live in Arizona — but still, it’s in the general area.
Anyway, I hope the following gives a little insight into how this game came to be. I don’t think we’ll be seeing any other matchups on the gridiron between The Citadel and Pac-10 teams in the near future, but you never know.
Filed under: Football, The Citadel | Tagged: ACC, Arizona, Big 10, Big East, Big XII, Clemson, Florida, Florida State, Ivy League, Kevin Higgins, Larry Leckonby, Les Robinson, Mississippi, North Carolina, Pac-10, Pittsburgh, Princeton, SEC, Stanford, Texas A&M, The Citadel, UCLA, Wisconsin |