Reviewing Samford-The Citadel: a very pleasant day in Charleston

Advanced stats from an enjoyable afternoon at Johnson Hagood Stadium:

Samford The Citadel
Starting Field Position Average 22.33 37.15
Offensive Success Rate 48.5% 42.9%
Big plays (20+ yards) 0 4
Finishing drives inside 40 (average points) 2.2 4.0
Turnovers 3 0
Expected turnovers 1.66 0.72
Possessions 12 13
Points per possession 0.92 2.15
Offensive Plays 68 63
Offensive rush play % 44.12% 68.25%
Yards/rush (sack-adjusted) 3.73 4.07
Yards/pass attempt (sack-adjusted) 5.39 6.35
Yards/play 4.78 4.79
3rd down conversions 33.3% (4/12) 41.2% (7/17)
4th down conversions 0 of 2 1 of 1
Red Zone TD% 50.0% 80.0%
Net punting 31.25 50.00
Time of possession 28:03 31:57
TOP/offensive play 24.39 seconds 29.95 seconds
Penalties 5 for 34 yards 5 for 47 yards
1st down passing 16/22, 134 yards, 2 INT 3/5, 44 yards
3rd and long passing 5/6, 2 sacks, 40 net yards 3/6, 54 yards
4th down passing 0/0 0/0
1st down yards/play 5.82 6.00
3rd down average yards to go 7.92 4.76
Defensive 3-and-outs+ 4 (of 13) 5 (of 12)

Housekeeping regarding the above:

  • The Citadel’s final possession of the second half and Samford’s final possession of the first half (both one-play kneel-downs) are not included in any of the categories, except for time of possession and TOP/offensive play.
  • It should be noted that absent Samford’s final drive of the game, when The Citadel appeared to be playing a very loose variation of “prevent defense”, SU would have averaged an offensive success rate of 42.6%, a yards/play rate of 4.10, and a first down yards/play rate of 5.0 (just to list three category examples).

Random observations:

– The quickest way to explain The Citadel’s overall dominance on Saturday is probably field position. Samford started just one drive beyond its own 30-yard line, and had five drives start at its own 20 or further back (two inside the 10-yard line). Conversely, The Citadel had five drives start in SU territory.

The Citadel’s four touchdown drives all started on Samford’s side of the field. The average starting field position for the Cadets on those TD marches was the SU 33 (technically the 32.5 yard line).

Samford punted four times during the game. Two of those punts came with the line of scrimmage at SU’s 3-yard line and 1-yard line. The Citadel’s defense did a great job of maintaining a field position edge in those situations (both of those possessions were three-and-outs).

The Citadel also intercepted two passes (on the first Samford offensive play of each half), both of which resulted in great field position for the home team.

– The other factor in the tilting of the field, of course, was The Citadel’s punt unit. James Platte had an incredible day booting the ball, with a net punting average of 50.0 on five punts. Samford’s average field position following those punts was its own 14.8 yard line.

For the afternoon, The Citadel’s advantage in net punting was 18.75 yards, an enormous edge.

I cannot remember a more memorable punting exhibition by a Bulldog at Johnson Hagood Stadium. Platte’s booming kicks drew audible ‘oohs’ and ‘aahs’ from the admiring crowd, as the punts were aesthetically pleasing as well as effective — tight spirals launched into the Charleston sky.

– It was not an easy day for two of the three placekickers who saw action. Samford was 1 for 2 on field goal tries, missing a 21-yarder early in the 4th quarter that would have brought SU within one score.

Meanwhile, The Citadel missed all three of its field goal attempts. I suspect that Maurice Drayton would take responsibility for the misfire on the first try, though, a 52-yarder that came after the coach intentionally took a delay-of-game penalty in an effort to draw Samford offside. It wasn’t a great idea, and looked worse when the kick fell short by about two yards.

– I mentioned three placekickers, though. Who was the third placekicker, you ask?

Well, he was a bagpiper named Richard…

The regimental band performed at halftime, putting on a nice show. One of the bagpipers was then chosen to be the contestant for the fan placekicking contest that usually takes place at the end of the third quarter.

Richard stepped up to the challenge. Was he wearing a kilt and a pouch as he kicked? Of course. He also wore the white boot that is part of The Citadel’s traditional bagpiper uniform on his left foot, and what appeared to be a cleat on his right (which he used to kick).

A breeze was beginning to swirl inside the stadium, which might explain why his first kick ricocheted off the left post. However, he had two tries from the initial distance to convert the field goal, and his second effort sailed through the uprights.

That led to the big moment, a 30-yard one-time attempt to win free pizza for a year. The pressure was on, but Richard’s kick was a no-doubter, hammered straight and true, flying above the crossbar with room to spare.

– While Drayton might have erred on the sequence leading to The Citadel’s first field goal attempt, the coach correctly challenged a spot late in the first half, a critical move that resulted in the Bulldogs picking up a key first down and maintaining possession. It was important at that time to deny Samford a chance to score again before the half ended.

The missed spot was by almost two full yards. Everyone in the stands saw that The Citadel had picked up the first down (a 10-yard pass from Johnathan Bennett to Dervon Pesnell, a nice play on both ends). The officials on the field had other ideas, however.

I was a little worried the replay review booth would not overrule the spot, as The Citadel has not had much luck with reviews this season, but justice prevailed.

It wasn’t the only spotting error of the game, just the most obvious. This has been an ongoing problem for SoCon officials over the years.

– Going for the jugular alert: with 3:58 to play, The Citadel took possession at Samford’s 44-yard line after the defense held on a fourth down attempt (Cale Williams with a rather emphatic stop). With a 21-3 lead, I expected to see a lot of runs up the middle to drain clock (or force Samford to use its remaining timeouts).

Naturally, the first play from scrimmage was a 27-yard pass play from Bennett to Pesnell (a great catch by Pesnell along the sideline).

That play call seemed to come out of left field, and I’m not sure it was the right thing to do in terms of the game state, but you know what? Sometimes you have to break tendencies, even when you’re in a position of strength. More power to the offensive staff. (And the bottom line is that it worked.)

From there, the Bulldogs ran the ball on six consecutive plays, with Bennett eventually scoring.

– I occasionally got concerned with the constant defensive rotations. Sometimes, multiple Bulldogs would race onto and off the field on plays for which Samford did not substitute. On those plays, I was worried The Citadel would not be ready at the snap — but that never happened.

“Samford has a high-powered offense, and we talked a lot about that,” said Citadel defensive lineman Chris Iverson, who finished with five tackles, including one for loss and a sack. “Samford’s tempo has been a problem for a lot of people, so we put a lot of emphasis on lining up quickly and communicating.”

The constant changing of personnel was obviously effective. On the afternoon, 23 different players for The Citadel registered at least one tackle (including placekicker Ben Barnes). Cale Williams led with 8 stops, while Je’Mazin Roberts had 7 and a forced fumble. DaVonyae Pettis had two of the Bulldogs’ eight tackles for loss (including a sack).

– Against Mercer last week, Samford’s offense had plays of 38, 77, 41, 35, 24, and 23 yards.

On Saturday, Samford’s longest offensive play from scrimmage was 19 yards.

– For a guy with a decent record against The Citadel, Chris Hatcher has certainly had a few games to forget in Charleston. This was one of them.

– Announced attendance: 8,977. I was a little concerned when I arrived on Saturday, as the parking lots were not exactly full. However, a decent-sized crowd eventually made its way inside the stadium.

There were very few Samford fans at the game. That is a long trip from Birmingham, though.

– It is one thing for a crowd to rush the field after a win. It is perhaps a bit unusual, however, for a team to rush the crowd (in this case, the student section) after a win, which the Bulldogs did following the Alma Mater.

I liked that a lot. Let’s see more of it, please.

– After the game, seniors and freshmen were awarded overnights. Juniors and sophomores had to be back on campus by 0100 hours.

It was a decidedly unusual combination of overnights/no overnights. The PA announcer informed the crowd that the freshmen had been granted overnights with “the authorization of the chairman of the Board of Visitors, Greg Delancey.”

(He meant Greg Delleney.)

– The Citadel is now 9-6-1 all-time for games played on October 26, including a 7-2-1 record at home on that date.

Saturday’s win was the biggest for The Citadel on October 26 since a 25-0 shutout of Oglethorpe in 1940, a game played at the “original” Johnson Hagood Stadium.

That was also a contest featuring strong defense and special teams play, as the Bulldogs held the Stormy Petrels to just 38 yards of total offense (and 0-for-6 passing). The Citadel’s Hank Foster returned a punt for a touchdown that day, while Ben Suitt blocked an Oglethorpe punt, setting up his own TD four plays later (the second of two TDs for Suitt).

The other touchdown for the Bulldogs was scored by Joe Bolduc. The Citadel missed on three of its four PAT attempts; perhaps placekicking is not meant to be on October 26, unless you are wearing a kilt.

The Bulldogs now get a much-needed bye week before finishing the season with three games. The first of those will be The Citadel’s last game of the season at Johnson Hagood Stadium, a Homecoming affair against Chattanooga. The final two contests will be road trips to the Upstate to face Wofford and Clemson.

I’m looking forward to Homecoming, which is always a fun time on campus. Chattanooga will be a tough opponent, but The Citadel should enter that matchup with a good deal of newfound confidence, particularly on defense.

It is good to see on-field progress being made. It is even better when that progress is reflected in victories.

A quick review of The Citadel-VMI

Advanced stats from The Military Classic of the South, though the game itself was not exactly a classic:

  The Citadel VMI
Starting Field Position Average 27.00 33.25
Offensive Success Rate 29.4% 36.1%
Big plays (20+ yards) 2 2
Finishing drives inside 40 (average points) 3.0 2.0
Turnovers 2 0
Expected turnovers 1.50 1.66
Possessions 11 12
Points per possession 1.18 0.83
Offensive Plays 51 61
Offensive rush play % 80.39% 54.10%
Yards/rush (sack-adjusted) 3.20 3.39
Yards/pass attempt (sack-adjusted) 6.40 4.11
Yards/play 3.73 3.72
3rd down conversions 0.00% (0-11) 14.28% (2-14)
4th down conversions 2 of 3 1 of 3
Red Zone TD% 0.0% 50.0%
Net punting 41.8 39.4
Time of possession 30:17 29:43
TOP/offensive play 34.28 seconds 29.23 seconds
Penalties 4 for 48 yards 7 for 51 yards
1st down passing 2/4, 53 yards (1 TD) 5/6, two sacks (44 net yards)
3rd and long passing 1/1, 4 sacks (-14 net yards) 3/7, 2 sacks (29 net yards)
4th down passing 0/0 0/1
1st down yards/play 5.65 4.65
3rd down average yards to go 6.00 8.57
Defensive 3-and-outs+ 4 (of 12) 7 (of 11)

Housekeeping regarding the above stats:

  • The Citadel’s final possession (a two-play kneel-down) is not included in any of the categories, except for time of possession and TOP/offensive play.
  • VMI was 1 for 3 on 4th down, but that does not include a 4th down attempt that was converted due to a pass interference penalty (the play which preceded the critical goal-line stand by the Bulldogs’ D).
  • VMI’s final play of the first half advanced the football inside The Citadel’s 40-yard line, but the Keydets had no time left to run another play; thus, that does not count as a possession inside the 40.
  • The Citadel was 2 for 3 on 4th down, per actual and advanced statistics, but that includes the bizarre play when punter James Platte was ruled to have been down before getting the punt off. The ruling came from the replay review booth and was, to put it politely, not well communicated to the press or public. That play is not reflected in the net punting category (since it wound up not being a punt), but was a de facto turnover (if not a technical one); it did result in part of VMI’s significant advantage in starting field position.

Very random observations:

– The Bulldogs’ defense played well. There were a few missed tackles, and The Citadel was unable to force a turnover (though the Keydets actually had a higher expected TO rate for the game than the Bulldogs), but on the whole it is hard to find much to complain about on that side of the ball.

Ten tackles for loss (including four sacks), only two big plays given up, less than one point allowed per possession. That will work more often than not.

– The defensive stand when VMI was up 10-6 and had first-and-goal on the Bulldogs’ 2-yard line was massive. It was arguably the pivotal point of the contest.

Should VMI have kicked the field goal on 4th down? Maybe. Going for it was definitely the correct move by the book, and I can’t really fault Danny Rocco’s decision. It was a bit of a logic vs. instincts situation, and I naturally vote for logic most of the time, but that call might have been an exception.

– The Citadel’s offense did not play well:

  • The Bulldogs were 0 for 11 on third down conversion attempts.
  • The Citadel had two turnovers, both giving VMI possession in Bulldogs territory.
  • The offense went 3-and-out (or worse) on seven of eleven drives.
  • On third-and-long plays, Johnathan Bennett completed one pass for 3 yards and was sacked four times.
  • Counting sacks, The Citadel had 64 net passing yards. The two big plays the offense had in the game were passes from Bennett to Tyler Cherry for 68 total yards, which means that aside from those completions, the Bulldogs had -4 net passing yards in eight drop-backs (four passes, four sacks).
  • The Citadel ran the ball on more than 80% of its offensive plays but only averaged 3.20 yards per rush, even when sack-adjusted.
  • Of The Citadel’s 51 offensive plays (again, not counting the end-of-game kneel-downs), 26 of them resulted in a gain of 2 yards or fewer.
  • It should not be forgotten that VMI had a defensive TD negated by a substitution infraction penalty, either.

And yet, the coveted Silver Shako is returning to its home in Charleston anyway. Despite the offense’s travails, it did produce the one huge play that ultimately won the game. The 43-yard touchdown pass from Bennett to Cherry was a really nice throw-and-catch, well executed on both ends. It makes you wonder why the Bulldogs can’t conjure up similar plays more often.

– I liked the color-on-color matchup with The Citadel wearing its light blue and VMI decked out in red. My personal preference is for the jerseys to be those colors with the pants being white (Bulldogs) and gold (Keydets), but yesterday’s look was solid.

– From The Roanoke Times:

VMI true freshman quarterback Brady Hammonds, making his third straight start, left the game with a knee injury early in the second quarter. But he returned to action — wearing a knee brace — for VMI’s final two series.

“He’s had this knee issue for about three weeks,” Rocco said. “He takes a shot and…he can’t really go out there and function and protect himself in the pocket, he can’t move. But then as it wears off, he’s able to get back into the game.”

…With VMI down 13-10, Hammonds returned to action for VMI’s penultimate series…Hammonds left the game [on VMI’s final drive] after being sacked and was again replaced by Wilson.

“(Hammonds) didn’t look very good getting up off the ground,” Rocco said.

But Rocco is optimistic Hammonds will be available to play next weekend.

You have to appreciate Hammonds’ toughness. When he re-entered the game, he could hardly move (though Hammonds somehow managed to scramble for 13 yards on a 3rd-and-8 play).

I really don’t know if he should play next week at Chattanooga, however.

– I was glad to see a small group of cadets dressed in summer leave were at the game. That is always a good thing, as it is when an assortment of keydets make their way to Charleston when the contest is held at Johnson Hagood Stadium. When the game returns to Foster Stadium in two years, I would like to see even more cadets in attendance.

– The Citadel has scored 13 points in each of the last two matchups against VMI. This time, that was enough for the victory. Next time, let’s score several touchdowns more.

Saturday, the Bulldogs return home to face a Samford team which just put 55 points on the board against Mercer, handing the Bears their first loss of the season. That will be a challenge.

I’m sure there will be some discussion in the tailgating areas about the recent article in The Post and Courier about the department of athletics (and the school in general). I’ve already given my take.

I’ll close this out with an unrelated tidbit, in case anyone is still reading and would like some (more) random information. I recently made my annual FOIA request for contracts of The Citadel’s upcoming non-conference football games. I have been informed that no new contracts were signed in the past 12 months, so there have been no additions on that front. 

Thus, the slate of future non-conference games remains as listed below.

2025: North Dakota State (8/30), at Mississippi (9/6), at Gardner-Webb (9/13)

2026: at Charlotte (9/5), Charleston Southern (9/19)

2027: at Navy (9/4), at North Dakota State (9/18)

2028: Gardner-Webb (9/2), at Clemson (9/16)

2029: at Army (10/6)

2033: at Army (11/19)

Worth noting: 2025 is another year in which, due to the calendar, FCS teams are allowed to schedule up to 12 regular-season games. That means there is an opportunity for The Citadel to schedule one more non-conference matchup for next season.

It could be that before adding another game, though, The Citadel might need to first hire a new AD…

Quick thoughts on The Citadel’s first football game of 2022

Well, my first quick thought is that I was glad when the game ended…

Stats of interest:

The Citadel Campbell
Field Position 25.33 39.22
Success Rate 32.08% 45.00%
Big plays (20+ yards) 2 3*
Finishing drives (average points) 3.33 4.14
Turnovers 3 1
Expected turnovers 1.94 0.72
Possessions 9 9
Points per possession 1.1 3.2
Offensive Plays 53 60
Yards/rush (sacks taken out) 4.04 5.53
Yards/pass attempt (including sacks) 5.33 7.41
Yards/play 4.19 6.22
3rd down conversions 4 of 13 6 of 13
4th down conversions 2 of 3 3 of 3
Red Zone TD% 50.00% 50.00%
Net punting 31.3 28.5
Time of possession 32:34 27:26
TOP/offensive play 36.87 sec 27.43 sec
Penalties 9 for 83 yards 9 for 85 yards
1st down passing 1-1, 19 yards, TD** 4-8, 36 yards, 1 sack against
3rd and long passing 1-2, 5 yards, 1 INT, 1 sack against 3-5, 42 yards, TD
4th down passing 1-1, 11 yards 2-2, 38 yards
1st down yards/play 5.11 5.32
3rd down average yards to go 7.31 8.31
Defensive 3-and-outs+ 1 4

*Not included: a 21-yard run for a would-be TD partly negated by a downfield holding penalty; the net gain on the play for the Camels was 11 yards
** An additional first down completion for 10 yards in the 2nd quarter for The Citadel was wiped out by a holding penalty

I believe the time of possession listed in the above table is correct. An error in the official scorebook originally credited The Citadel with over 14 minutes of possession time in the 2nd quarter.

[Edit: this has now been officially corrected.]

A few observations:

  • The Citadel gained 2 or fewer yards on 42.1% of its first down plays.
  • In the 3rd quarter, The Citadel ran 14 offensive plays. Only one of them would statistically be considered “successful”. The shuffling of the o-line after starting center Mike Bartilucci was injured might have been a factor.
  • Sawyer Whitman, a freshman OL from Gaffney, made his first career appearance for the Bulldogs.
  • Almost half (26) of The Citadel’s 53 offensive plays came on the Bulldogs’ first two drives. The Citadel only scored 3 points on those possessions.
  • The Citadel’s nine possessions ended as follows: TD (1), FG (1), punt (3), interception (2), lost fumble (1), and turnover on downs (1).
  • On seven of its nine possessions, Campbell had a first down inside the Bulldogs’ 40-yard line. Considering that two of those drives began inside the 40, and a third one started right at The Citadel’s 40, the Bulldogs’ defense did a good job mostly keeping the Camels out of the end zone after Campbell’s first two possessions.
  • Campbell’s nine possessions ended as follows: TD (3), FG (3), punt (2), end of half (1). (The Camels’ one turnover came on special teams.)
  • The scorebook participation list (which is not official) lists 48 Bulldogs as having played in Thursday night’s game. I tend to think the actual number was 46, but I can’t be sure.
  • Campbell’s participation list included 62 players.
  • The Bulldogs have to do better than average 31 net punting yards, although if one-third of all punts are muffed by the opponents, that would be an acceptable trade-off.
  • James Platte is the first Bulldog to appear in a game this season who doesn’t have a biographical writeup on the school website.
  • It appears that Ben Brockington (now #97) and John Hewlett (#73) have traded jersey numbers.
  • As of September 5, Alex Ramsey, the graduate transfer from VMI, is no longer listed on The Citadel’s online roster.
  • The Citadel committed far too many penalties (9 for 83 yards). The false starts and holds can be (and were) drive-killers, but the personal foul/unnecessary roughness/unsportsmanlike conduct infractions simply made me shake my head. Those are completely unacceptable.
  • During his Monday afternoon press conference, Brent Thompson confirmed that starting strong safety Wilson Hendricks III is out for the season. That will be a tough blow for the defense. Hendricks, a sophomore from Travelers Rest, led the team in tackles last season (and had seven stops against Campbell).

The Citadel must be a lot better on Saturday in its home opener against East Tennessee State. In their first game, the Buccaneers did exactly what a good team would be expected to do against an overmatched opponent, blasting Mars Hill 44-7.

I might have more to say later in the week.